किम्
सर्वनामkya, kim, keem, कीमक्या
English: what
इसी शब्द की अन्य प्रविष्टियाँ
अन्य कोशों में
Monier-Williams · kim
kím ind. (fr. 1. ki, originally nom. and acc. sg. n. of 2. ká, q.v.), what? how? whence? wherefore? why?
kím ind. (fr. 1. ki, originally nom. and acc. sg. n. of 2. ká, q.v.), what? how? whence? wherefore? why?
Monier-Williams · kim
kim is much used as a particle of interrogation like the Lat. num, an, sometimes translatable by 'whether?' but oftener serving only like a note of interrogation to mark a question (e.g. kiṃ vyādhā vane'smin saṃcaranti, 'do hunters roam about in this wood?' In an interrogation the verb, if uncompounded with a preposition, generally retains its accent after kim Pāṇ. 8-1, 44). To this sense may be referred the kim expressing inferiority, deficiency, &c. at the beginning of compounds (e.g. kiṃ-rājan, what sort of king? i.e. a bad king Pāṇ. 2-1, 64 ; v, 4, 70) ‖ also the kim prefix
kim is much used as a particle of interrogation like the Lat. num, an, sometimes translatable by 'whether?' but oftener serving only like a note of interrogation to mark a question (e.g. kiṃ vyādhā vane'smin saṃcaranti, 'do hunters roam about in this wood?' In an interrogation the verb, if uncompounded with a preposition, generally retains its accent after kim Pāṇ. 8-1, 44). To this sense may be referred the kim expressing inferiority, deficiency, &c. at the beginning of compounds (e.g. kiṃ-rājan, what sort of king? i.e. a bad king Pāṇ. 2-1, 64 ; v, 4, 70) ‖ also the kim prefix
Monier-Williams · kim
kim is very frequently connected with other particles, as follows: kím aṅgá, wherefore then? RV ‖ atha kim, átha ‖ kim api, somewhat, to a considerable extent, rather, much more, still further Śak. Megh. &c ‖ kim iti, why? Śak. Kum. Pañcat. &c ‖ kim-iva, what for? Śiś. xvi, 31 ‖ kím-u or kím-utá how much more? how much less? RV. ŚBr. MBh. &c ‖ kiṃ kila, what a pity! (expressing dissatisfaction) Pāṇ. 3-3, 146 ‖ kiṃ-ca, moreover, further Pañcat. Kathās. &c ‖ what more (expressing impatience) Śak ‖ kiṃ-cana (originally -ca na, negative = 'in no way'), to a certain degree
kim is very frequently connected with other particles, as follows: kím aṅgá, wherefore then? RV ‖ atha kim, átha ‖ kim api, somewhat, to a considerable extent, rather, much more, still further Śak. Megh. &c ‖ kim iti, why? Śak. Kum. Pañcat. &c ‖ kim-iva, what for? Śiś. xvi, 31 ‖ kím-u or kím-utá how much more? how much less? RV. ŚBr. MBh. &c ‖ kiṃ kila, what a pity! (expressing dissatisfaction) Pāṇ. 3-3, 146 ‖ kiṃ-ca, moreover, further Pañcat. Kathās. &c ‖ what more (expressing impatience) Śak ‖ kiṃ-cana (originally -ca na, negative = 'in no way'), to a certain degree
Monier-Williams · kim
kim (in comp.)
kim (in comp.)